Suggested patch for log1+ Bradley Lucier (09 Apr 2019 18:04 UTC)
(missing)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Bradley Lucier (22 Jul 2019 00:47 UTC)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Arthur A. Gleckler (22 Jul 2019 01:15 UTC)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ John Cowan (22 Jul 2019 01:20 UTC)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Arthur A. Gleckler (22 Jul 2019 01:26 UTC)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Arthur A. Gleckler (22 Jul 2019 01:33 UTC)
Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Apr 2019 18:13 UTC)

Re: Suggested patch for log1+ Bradley Lucier 22 Jul 2019 00:47 UTC

I'll try this again. Sorry about the mail problems.

On 7/21/19 8:38 PM, Lucier, Bradley J wrote:
> Perhaps this patch slipped through the cracks.  If it were merged, I
> could take it off my mental to-do list.
>
> Brad
>
> On 4/9/19 2:03 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
>> This is a fix for a FIXME, in case it is desired.
>>
>> It turns out my git-fu is not truly up to snuff, so I'm including the
>> patch in this email.
>>
>> It passes the SRFI-144 tests (using Larceny) and shows improvement in
>> the tests in the test file test-log1p.scm (compiled using Gambit).
>>
>> Brad
>>