Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> schrieb am Mo., 19. Dez. 2016 um 10:57 Uhr:
Marc,

naming it "assert-type" is a very good idea. The new name will appear in the next draft. (In case "assert" is going to be renamed as well, e.g. to "check", "assert-type" would then probably become "check-type".)

As "assert" is probably also of already widespread use (with different semantics), I suggest "assume" (and "assume-type") for an alternative.

Marc