On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:

As a solution I propose to interpret/change the wording "Mappings are disjoint from all other Scheme types" as/into "Mappings are disjoint from all Scheme types that were in existence when the library was loaded for the first time."

Given that we know we'll have to clean it up, I would leave it alone.  "In existence" is rather vague, anyway:  does it mean "exists as a SRFI" or "is loaded into this process" or what?

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield], one who looks with unconcern
on a man struggling for life in the water, and when he has reached ground
encumbers him with help?        --Samuel Johnson