We don't have an implementation of (srfi 146 hash) at present, so unless Marc rules otherwise,hashmaps will be moved to another SRFI anyway. I have sent him a proposed draft with ordered mappings only.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

The two libraries (srfi 146) and (srfi 146 hash) feel unbalanced.
How about:

(srfi 146): all bindings
(srfi 146 ordered): mapping*
(srfi 146 hash): hashmap*

--
Alex

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=rBAxDxCgJFjJUssha9ixdMZU57qO20An