We don't have an implementation of (srfi 146 hash) at present, so unless Marc rules otherwise,hashmaps will be moved to another SRFI anyway. I have sent him a proposed draft with ordered mappings only.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:The two libraries (srfi 146) and (srfi 146 hash) feel unbalanced.How about:(srfi 146): all bindings(srfi 146 ordered): mapping*(srfi 146 hash): hashmap*--AlexTo unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=rBAxDxCgJFjJUssha9i xdMZU57qO20An