On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Sudarshan S Chawathe <xxxxxx@eip10.org> wrote:

I agree with all these changes, and have a particular note on this one:

   5. (very minor) For mapping-split, I don't think I understand the
      motivation for returning five values (< <= = >= >) instead of
      just three (< = >).  I see the connection of the 5 values with
      the earlier 5 procedures, but the argument in favor of only 3 is
      that those three will be disjoint (and if the <= and >= ones are
      needed, then mapping-union can be conveniently used).

If it is adopted, I will change oset-split accordingly.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
And it was said that ever after, if any man looked in that Stone,
unless he had a great strength of will to turn it to other purpose,
he saw only two aged hands withering in flame.   --"The Pyre of Denethor"