Changed the paragraph so that it only applies to the (srfi 146) implementation. If he wants, Arthur Gleckler may say something for the (hamt)/(srfi 146 hash) implementation.
I just checked, and I ended up using these SRFIs in the HAMT implementation, including the tests:
(srfi 1)
(srfi 16)
(srfi 27)
(srfi 113)
(srfi 125)
(srfi 128)
(srfi 132)
(srfi 143)
(srfi 151)
Would you mind adding the same language that you used for the rest of the SRFI 146 implementation for these?