On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sudarshan S Chawathe <xxxxxx@eip10.org> wrote:

Minor note:

The file srfi/113/test.sld has two cases of duplicate definitions (which
I believe are not legal): Both cases redefine whole4 and they are on
lines 265 & 272 and 539 & 546.

At first I thought this problem may be one inherited from the SRFI 113
code but, based on a quick look at it, I think it doesn't affect SRFI
113's version.

Thanks for reporting this.

CC-ing John Cowan.

Actually, the same problem does seem to appear in the SRFI 113 tests. See sets/sets-test.scm in the SRFI 113 repo.

We should look into this, but since this is in the implementation, I'm not going to delay SRFI 146 for it.