Re: apparent bug in sample implementation of SRFI 148
William D Clinger 25 Jul 2017 00:33 UTC
Al Petrofsky wrote:
> As long as implementors are tidying up this kind of thing, I suggest they
> also adopt the rule that in an r7rs syntax-rules form that specifies the
> identifier that will be interpreted in the rules as an ellipsis, it is an
> error if the same (bound-identifier=?) identifier is simultaneously
> specified to be interpreted as a literal.
Thank you. That will be enforced by Larceny v1.3 (and by the nightly
build to be made available tomorrow morning).
Will