On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
In SRFI 33, SLIB, and SRFI 60, the function is first-set-bit.  In R6RS, however, it is bitwise-first-bit-set, with the two last words interchanged.  The table has now been corrected to say so.

But I propose to leave the name as first-set-bit, contra R6RS.  Anyone object to this?

That sounds like a good idea.  first-bit-set is only one exclamation point away from a name that should apply to a setter, not a getter.