ISSUE: first-set-bit John Cowan (09 May 2017 18:01 UTC)
Re: ISSUE: first-set-bit Arthur A. Gleckler (10 May 2017 06:05 UTC)
Re: ISSUE: first-set-bit Peter Lane (11 May 2017 19:37 UTC)

Re: ISSUE: first-set-bit Peter Lane 11 May 2017 19:36 UTC

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org

>     In SRFI 33, SLIB, and SRFI 60, the function is first-set-bit.  In
>     R6RS, however, it is bitwise-first-bit-set, with the two last words
>     interchanged.  The table has now been corrected to say so.
>
>     But I propose to leave the name as first-set-bit, contra R6RS.
>     Anyone object to this?

I like first-set-bit.  No objection!

--
Peter Lane
http://peterlane.info/scheme.html