I assume you mean "extended-domain"; extending the range would not be backward compatible, which is forbidden by our charter.

Yes, of course.  But it's a steeply uphill climb that I'd rather not take if I can help it.

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:53 PM Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:
> An implementation is free to do so, of course.  But a change to the
> R7RS-small standard is a much bigger deal.

What about R7RS-large - can it mandate extended-range versions of
R7RS-small procedures?