Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Amirouche Boubekki (01 Aug 2020 14:29 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Amirouche Boubekki (01 Aug 2020 14:39 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 John Cowan (02 Aug 2020 00:58 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Amirouche Boubekki (02 Aug 2020 08:10 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Linus Björnstam (02 Aug 2020 10:03 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 John Cowan (04 Aug 2020 14:17 UTC)
Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Aug 2020 15:22 UTC)

Re: Benchmarking srfi-41, srfi-121 and srfi-158 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 02 Aug 2020 15:22 UTC

Very interesting results. I am not sure whether the numbers were
different in Guile 2.X, which Mark's comment must have been about, but
it is obvious that one should fix the apparent inefficiency of streams
first. While they may be slower than generators, a factor of 17 (or
even 30!) is hard to explain. (It would be interesting to run the same
benchmark for GHC, which should have a highly optimized implementation
for streams.