Re: generator-find: Bug in sample implementation and omission in text
Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 14 Sep 2020 07:14 UTC
*bump*
Please correct. :)
Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 19:38 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de>:
>
> (1) In the sample implementation, the predicate PRED may also be called on #<eof>. This cannot be right.
>
> (2) In the main text of the SRFI, it should either say that generator-find will leave the generator in an undefined state or it should say that the generator is left in a state where the next invocation of generator-find will find the next item satisfying the predicate.
>