I don't know, if people are interested (and with Alex's blessing) I
could open a pull request to merge this back to the srfi repository.
It may make it easier to have a reference implementation for srfi-166
too (not sure if that document is finalized yet)
Thank you! That would be terrific.
Since this is a sample implementation, not a change to the SRFI document, we can definitely include it in the SRFI 159 repo. As a courtesy to Alex, though, please check with him. But let me know even if you don't hear back in a week or so.
Please be sure to include a "README.*" file that puts your implementation in context.