> You created so many repos it's hard to keep track. That's probably a
> good excuse why I didn't know about this one :)

No problem. I've basically been begging people to pay attention to it :D
Everyone is busy.

> Will do later. I'll need to see if I can find any scheme without
> complex support and how to exclude those tests.

It would be nice to have standard feature identifiers to detect things
like complex numbers (as well as little-endian, 64-bit, full
continuations, etc.) That would make it a little easier to write
cond-expand's.

>> Since the SRFI 159 tests are from Chibi and/or the SRFI, I assume they
>> are MIT licensed.
>
> No explicit copyright notes in the test file so it's likely Chibi's
> license, MIT.

I think most of Chibi is under the BSD-3-Clause license, but Alex gave
permission to dual-license some Chibi tests under MIT. The practical
implications of the two licenses should be the exact same ones.

I've been trying to keep srfi-test MIT-only, just like the SRFI
documents themselves have always been MIT-only. It will make a license
audit in the future much easier.