On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:53 AM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:58 PM Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

  (srfi 160 base): @?, @vector?, xxxxxx@vector,
        @vector-length, @vector-ref, @vector-set

I'm going to extend the (srfi x4) library so that it reexports SRFI 4, which will be basically just this with the addition of list->@vector, @vector->list, and @vector.  @? would be a good addition.

Ah, I took (srfi x4) for an implementation detail - is it then an official library?

I think the libraries defined in a SRFI should all fit within that SRFIs namespace, hence the suggestion (srfi 160 base).

Alex