@vector-unfold
   says "On the first call to f, the state's value is zero", should be "the state's value is seed."

@vector-cumulate
   it can be a bit more verbose.  How about something like this:
   Like @vector-fold, but returns an @vector, which has the same length of @vec, and
   the 0-th element is the first result of (f nil), the next element is the result of (f (f nil)) and so on.

@vector-take-while
@vector-take-while-right
@vector-drop-while
@vector-drop-while-right
   missing close paren

   for take-*  : shouldn't it be "the longest"?

@vector-index
@vector-index-right
@vector-skip
@vector-skip-right
   It's obvious, but just for completeness: Add "Returns #f if there's no such element"

@vector-any
   Should return the first true result of pred?, not the element.

@vector-every
    Should return the last true result of pred? if all elements satisfy it, not the element.

@vector-filter
@vector-remove
    missing closing paren

@vector->vector
vector->@vector
   Don't they support optional start/end arguments?

The library names:
The distinction of (srfi 160 base) and other srfi 160 library is explained under "implementation".  So it's not clear if it's just the reference implementation's strategy, or the library names are a part of the specification that all conforming implementations should follow.  If it's indeed the case, maybe we can have "Library names" section after "Notation".



On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:48 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
I've just published draft #11 of SRFI
160.  It was submitted by John Cowan,
author of the SRFI.

  <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-160/>

John has asked me to announce "last
call" for this SRFI.  He believes that
it is ready for finalization, but would
like to give reviewers one last chance
to submit corrections and feedback
before we finalize it.

In particular, I appeal to anyone
reading this to try the sample
implementation, run the tests, and send
feedback about your results.

If you're interested in this SRFI,
please give your feedback via the SRFI
160 mailing list before 2019/8/16.
After that, assuming that no major
revisions are required, we will declare
it final.

Note that we're using a two-week
last-call period for this SRFI at John's
request.

Here are the commit comments for this
draft:

  - Implementation almost imports but
    not quite
  - Compiles okay under Chicken
  - Just a few bugs in the system...
  - All tests passing
  - Oops, deleted too many files
  - Publish eleventh draft.  Add
    See-also links.

Here's the diff:

  <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-160/compare/3e2a1f33a64a5553aae60f0ffac8e98f10f607c3..8553632dfb047f8e50519a03b8e3580d87a5d271>

Regards,


SRFI Editor