Also, @vector-unfold! and @vector-unfold-right! seem to be added at the last minute and not accompanied

by reference implementation.  I can make PR for that, too.

BTW, the second argument of these two procedures in srfi document are supposed to be '@vec' rather than 'vec'.

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:24 AM Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks to John for long work.

So we dropped restart safety (multiple returns from @vector-map) after all?  (I thought John's message that he

added explicit language to @vector-map.) 

We could leave it out---in that case, since the current @vector-map reference implementation isn't restart-safe,   

I'd imagine it would be de-facto that @vector-map won't be restart-safe.

If it's an overlook, we need to fix reference implementation as well, which I can make PR.

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:59 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

P.S.: Here are the changes, as a diff, since the previous draft:

  https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-160/compare/8553632dfb047f8e50519a03b8e3580d87a5d271..f09de3cb9376897bd0ba3df0c1cf4cbdf72056ca