On 05/22/2018 02:51 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> The SRFI requires that a c64/c128vector be disjoint from an f32/f64vector, as everything must be disjoint from everything else except u8vectors, which must be the same as bytevectors. However, the former can be implemented using the latter with a trivial record wrapper, and that's how the sample implementation is going to work.

Right - but I suggest adding some wording to that effect.  Something like:

   The real and imaginary parts, respectively, of the elements of a c64vector
   *should* have the same range and precision as the elements of a f32vector,
   and similarly for c128vector/f64vector.

Or replace *should* by "typically" or "in most implmentation".
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/