On 1/9/19 8:46 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
> I just wonder whether you would like to allow u1 (bit) arrays.

Yes, that would make sense.  Perhaps a minor re-phasing would be better:

    The `vectag` specifies the type of the elements of the array.
    An implementation that supports the literal syntax of SRFI-4 (or its proposed update SRFI 160)
    should allow the `TAG` from that specification as a `vectag`.  An implementation may support
    other values for `vectag` as long as there is no ambiguity.

--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/