no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Per Bothner (14 Dec 2018 18:02 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Bradley Lucier (14 Dec 2018 19:01 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (15 Dec 2018 08:55 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Bradley Lucier (16 Dec 2018 23:34 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Dec 2018 09:22 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Bradley Lucier (18 Dec 2018 01:34 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Dec 2018 14:40 UTC)
Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Dec 2018 14:44 UTC)

Re: no feedback on srfi-164 Enhanced multi-dimensional Arrays Bradley Lucier 14 Dec 2018 19:01 UTC

On 12/14/18 1:55 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:02 PM Per Bothner <xxxxxx@bothner.com
> <mailto:xxxxxx@bothner.com>> wrote:
>
>     Cowan has mentioned a range API:
>     However, it is not a specification - arguments aren't even specified.
>     (It is also way too big an API in my opinion.)
>
>
> It's still evolving.

By a "range API", do you mean something like what I call "intervals" in
SRFI 122?

Brad