Agreed. Looking at SRFI 168, however, I thought they might be just local conventions for parameter names. The relation between the two SRFIs is not really made clear anywhere.
Without getting into the meat of this srfi, the names seem awkward.
Most obviously, there is a set! operator, which conflicts with r7rs.
The 'make' procedure conflicts with (at least) Kawa and Guile.
The 'range' name might be better saved for a procedure that returns
a "range" (sequence of integers) value.
Obviously all of these can renamed on import, but it seems rather contrary
to Scheme naming conventions.
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/