I tried to fixed the naming in https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-167/pull/1/commits/a31e084567d58d967b6dc64d6e4a1eb004f59cec

I am not sure about the best name for the srfi. I hesitate between 'store' and `okvs`. I think `store` is too generic.

Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 07:03, Per Bothner <xxxxxx@bothner.com> a écrit :

Without getting into the meat of this srfi, the names seem awkward.
Most obviously, there is a set! operator, which conflicts with r7rs.
The 'make' procedure conflicts with (at least) Kawa and Guile.
The 'range' name might be better saved for a procedure that returns
a "range" (sequence of integers) value.

Obviously all of these can renamed on import, but it seems rather contrary
to Scheme naming conventions.
--
        --Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=Iv39SLL8JKn16Xoj08EgsTTVKIlgFzfk