I've just published draft #5 of SRFI 167.  It was
submitted by Amirouche Boubekki, author of the
SRFI.

  <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-167/>

Here are the commit comments on the draft:

  - remove okvs-maximum-key because there is no
    good reasons
  - draft #5
  - rationale++
  - CONFIG: it is an error if options are not
    recognized.
  - okvs: move back HOME to config as it is not
    mandatory
  - rename 'okvs' to 'okvs-open'
  - fix html: close <p> with </p>
  - okvs-debug: remove it
  - adapt okvs-transaction-metadata into
    okvs-transaction-state
  - Add to 'okvs-in-transaction' optional
    arguments `MAKE-STATE` and `CONFIG`
  - replace argument 'transaction' with 'some'
  - rename 'okvs-prefix' to 'okvs-prefix-range'
  - Revert "okvs: move back HOME to config as it
    is not mandatory"
  - fully bring back okvs HOME argument
  - rename argument SOME to OKVS-OR-TRANSACTION
  - Fix punctuation, minor errors, etc.
  - Publish fifth draft.

Here's the diff:

  <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-167/compare/3301c77f0caa4a9950972a613145a918c212a563..45d1cd47a30dfe1dd8445f8f5bcff6af467e8f9c>

Regards,

SRFI Editor