Re: specification by implications and example
Shriram Krishnamurthi 17 Jan 2000 02:36 UTC
Per Bothner wrote:
> How about this change to the SRFI? [...]
If this is the change you want, so be it. You should also edit the
"Standard setters" section to be of the form
(setter car-proc) --> set-car!
where car-proc is eq? to the built-in primitive car, and so forth,
rather than the current format.
'shriram