Re: where is srfi-17 going?
Mikael Djurfeldt 24 Jan 2000 17:22 UTC
Mikael Djurfeldt <xxxxxx@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:
> We have no supported way of setting the setter associated with a
> getter, but rather have a constructor
>
> make-getter-with-setter GETTER SETTER
>
> with corresponding selector
>
> setter GETTER-WITH-SETTER
Sorry, it's
make-procedure-with-setter PROCEDURE SETTER
procedure PWS
setter PWS
(I'm very busy with other things right now, and don't really have time
to spend on this discussion, even though I'd like to.)