where is srfi-17 going? Per Bothner (23 Jan 2000 21:32 UTC)
where is srfi-17 going? Shriram Krishnamurthi (23 Jan 2000 22:03 UTC)
Re: where is srfi-17 going? Per Bothner (23 Jan 2000 23:18 UTC)
Re: where is srfi-17 going? Shriram Krishnamurthi (24 Jan 2000 02:17 UTC)
Re: where is srfi-17 going? Michael Livshin (24 Jan 2000 11:01 UTC)
Re: where is srfi-17 going? Mikael Djurfeldt (24 Jan 2000 16:27 UTC)
Re: where is srfi-17 going? Mikael Djurfeldt (24 Jan 2000 17:25 UTC)

Re: where is srfi-17 going? Mikael Djurfeldt 24 Jan 2000 17:22 UTC

Mikael Djurfeldt <xxxxxx@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> We have no supported way of setting the setter associated with a
> getter, but rather have a constructor
>
>   make-getter-with-setter GETTER SETTER
>
> with corresponding selector
>
>   setter GETTER-WITH-SETTER

Sorry, it's

  make-procedure-with-setter PROCEDURE SETTER
  procedure PWS
  setter PWS

(I'm very busy with other things right now, and don't really have time
 to spend on this discussion, even though I'd like to.)