I don't think we exactly all agreed on it, and of course it violates the "don't vary from scsh any more than required" rule. But ignoring that I think it would be an improvement ... except how far do we take it? There are a lot of "getters" in this SRFI....- Harold----- Original message -----From: John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>Date: Monday, August 26, 2019 1:06 PMJust got lost AFAIK.On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:26 PM Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:The draft still seems to have the old procedures:- user-uid- user-gidinstead of the new ones we discussed (and IIRC all agreed upon):- (get-)user-real-uid- (get-)user-real-gid- (get-)user-effective-uid- (get-)user-effective-gidWere these lost in a sea of edits or is there a rationale for stickingwith the old ones after all?