On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 9:50 AM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote:
I want to bring back the `parent-pid` and `process-group` accessors as well as adding `session-id`.  They don't fit well into my ProcessesCowan proposal, but they are harmless and trivial to implement.'
I am retracting this statement.  They fit into ProcessesCowan well enough, now that I have the concept of a synthetic process object (one that is made either from a pid or directly for the current process).  You cannot wait on a synthetic proc, but you can get its parent and get/set its process-group, session, etc.



John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Normally I can handle panic attacks on my own; but panic is, at the moment,
a way of life.                 --Joseph Zitt