> I'm suggesting that the process be rethought, because the MIT license
> is meaningless at best for a derivative work like srfi-170.html, and
> soon srfi-205.html.  I'm not sure if any harm can come from it's
> invalid assertion, given the below test that's before SRFI 170's BSD
> license, but I can't see any good coming from it.

Let's hear Arthur's opinion on this.