And I forgot one that needs to be added to chibi-scheme/NOTES.txt (as well as updating the TODO file, that'll be a pull request to Arthur RSN).  fd->port does not implement any of the restrictions in its last sentence, "It is an error if a port already exists that encapsulates fd, or if an attempt is made to use fd->port twice on the same fd."  Which again would require diving more deeply in the Chibi's port implementation.

- Harold

----- Original message -----
From: John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>
To: Harold Ancell <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com>
Cc: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <xxxxxx@speechcode.com>, xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org
Subject: Re: Chibi Scheme SRFI 170 sample implementation done (for now)
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 6:35 PM

Fixed, along with similar changes to scsh/NOTES.html.  See <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-170/pull/25>.

Further changes can be made to these files if necessary without affecting finalization.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:24 PM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote:

Almost, I didn't make clear that in srfi/chibi-scheme/NOTES.html you need to point out that open-file has the same limitations as fd->port (that awaits Alex doing it for real, and/or my diving a lot deeper into Chibi Scheme's port implementation).   The rest of the changes look good and complete.

- Harold

----- Original message -----
From: John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 3:37 PM

Okay, see <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-170/pull/24>.  I think this is everything Harold requested.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:19 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:52 AM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote:
 
"You may finalize when you are ready, Gleck[l]er."
 
Since John said "I'll adjust the SRFI accordingly as soon as I get back from voting," I'll wait until I get word from him, too.

Thanks.