|
Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(29 Jun 2019 02:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
John Cowan
(01 Jul 2019 02:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2019 10:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family Lassi Kortela (01 Jul 2019 10:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
John Cowan
(01 Jul 2019 11:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
John Cowan
(01 Jul 2019 15:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2019 19:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2019 20:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(04 Jul 2019 02:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
John Cowan
(04 Jul 2019 03:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
Shiro Kawai
(04 Jul 2019 04:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Return value of spawn-family
John Cowan
(05 Jul 2019 22:46 UTC)
|
|
Initial comments through 3.3 File System
hga@xxxxxx
(07 Jul 2019 21:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Initial comments through 3.3 File System
John Cowan
(08 Jul 2019 12:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Initial comments through 3.3 File System
hga@xxxxxx
(08 Jul 2019 16:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Initial comments through 3.3 File System
John Cowan
(08 Jul 2019 17:34 UTC)
|
Like Shiro, I would strongly favor a process object, for basically the same reasons he stated. That leads to the question: should not-yet-spawned and spawned processes be the same type of object, and do we even need to specify that.
