Re: Remaining things to remove mostly per the 80/20 rule Lassi Kortela 12 Aug 2019 12:02 UTC
> I don't think there's a positive payoff in the suggested proliferation > of SRFIs. They're isolated, but they still require jumping down to > the world of C, and might as well be bundled with this base POSIX SRFI. > >> Things that deal with user/group _numbers_ pertaining to the current >> process > > They're very useful at this base POSIX SRFI level for e.g. logging, so > I think they should stay here, and have the processes SRFI(s) require > at least some specific subset of procedures in this SRFI. These are good arguments. I originally thought having more small SRFIs is good than a few big ones, but you may convince me to change my opinion.