Re: Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag

Show/hide message thread

Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag hga@xxxxxx (17 May 2020 16:08 UTC)

My contribution to SRFI 170 is almost finished hga@xxxxxx (19 May 2020 15:58 UTC)

Re: My contribution to SRFI 170 is almost finished Arthur A. Gleckler (19 May 2020 17:17 UTC)

Re: Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag Arthur A. Gleckler (22 Jun 2020 23:27 UTC)

Re: Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag hga@xxxxxx (23 Jun 2020 01:23 UTC)

Re: Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag John Cowan (23 Jun 2020 01:52 UTC)

Re: Should real-path still be in SRFI 170, and should it take a per-process? flag John Cowan 23 Jun 2020 01:52 UTC