|
fdes and port
Shiro Kawai
(24 Jul 2020 07:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
hga@xxxxxx
(16 Aug 2020 11:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
Shiro Kawai
(16 Aug 2020 12:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
John Cowan
(17 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
Shiro Kawai
(17 Aug 2020 20:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
Duy Nguyen
(06 Sep 2020 13:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
Shiro Kawai
(06 Sep 2020 13:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
John Cowan
(06 Sep 2020 21:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
hga@xxxxxx
(06 Sep 2020 21:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
John Cowan
(06 Sep 2020 21:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Sep 2020 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Duy Nguyen (07 Sep 2020 09:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
hga@xxxxxx
(07 Sep 2020 01:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
John Cowan
(07 Sep 2020 02:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: fdes (now fd) and port
hga@xxxxxx
(07 Sep 2020 12:43 UTC)
|
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:26 AM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 2:22 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: >> >> Sounds good, thanks! No reason to worry about one day when we are 480+ days into this effort. And thanks to you and to all for sticking with it so long. > > > Thank you all! > > I can see the light at the end of the tunnel, and it's not a train. Don't jinx it. There are still many parts of posix left out of this srfi :D But seriously a system srfi [1] like this would extend the scope of portable scheme programs a lot. [1] Yes in my view posix is "system". -- Duy
