fdes and port Shiro Kawai (24 Jul 2020 07:36 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port hga@xxxxxx (16 Aug 2020 11:49 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Shiro Kawai (16 Aug 2020 12:28 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2020 20:42 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Duy Nguyen (06 Sep 2020 13:32 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Shiro Kawai (06 Sep 2020 13:52 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port John Cowan (06 Sep 2020 21:11 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port hga@xxxxxx (06 Sep 2020 21:20 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port John Cowan (06 Sep 2020 21:22 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Sep 2020 21:26 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port Duy Nguyen (07 Sep 2020 09:09 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port hga@xxxxxx (07 Sep 2020 01:07 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port John Cowan (07 Sep 2020 02:43 UTC)
Re: fdes (now fd) and port hga@xxxxxx (07 Sep 2020 12:43 UTC)

Re: fdes (now fd) and port Duy Nguyen 07 Sep 2020 09:08 UTC

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:26 AM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 2:22 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good, thanks! No reason to worry about one day when we are 480+ days into this effort.  And thanks to you and to all for sticking with it so long.
>
>
> Thank you all!
>
> I can see the light at the end of the tunnel, and it's not a train.

Don't jinx it. There are still many parts of posix left out of this
srfi :D But seriously a system srfi [1] like this would extend the
scope of portable scheme programs a lot.

[1] Yes in my view posix is "system".
--
Duy