On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote:
> > This may be out of scope, but what about (terminal? (current-output-port))?
>
> That should work if you wrap (current-output-port) in port-internal-fd?,
> i.e. (terminal? (port-internal-fd (current-output-port)))?

It does, except the fact that I would avoid port-internal-fd as much
as possible. If it has to be called, then it could be hidden behind
terminal?.
--
Duy