Some comments
Duy Nguyen
(09 Sep 2020 11:37 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(09 Sep 2020 13:14 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
Duy Nguyen
(09 Sep 2020 14:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
John Cowan
(10 Sep 2020 02:04 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(10 Sep 2020 03:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(10 Sep 2020 03:21 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
John Cowan
(10 Sep 2020 03:55 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
Duy Nguyen
(10 Sep 2020 09:16 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(10 Sep 2020 14:42 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments Duy Nguyen (10 Sep 2020 15:34 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(10 Sep 2020 14:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
John Cowan
(10 Sep 2020 15:38 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
Duy Nguyen
(10 Sep 2020 09:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: Some comments
Alex Shinn
(10 Sep 2020 13:01 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Fwd: Some comments
John Cowan
(10 Sep 2020 16:24 UTC)
|
||
Re: Fwd: Some comments
hga@xxxxxx
(10 Sep 2020 18:15 UTC)
|
||
Re: Fwd: Some comments
John Cowan
(10 Sep 2020 18:20 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments Duy Nguyen 10 Sep 2020 15:34 UTC
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM <xxxxxx@ancell-ent.com> wrote: > > This may be out of scope, but what about (terminal? (current-output-port))? > > That should work if you wrap (current-output-port) in port-internal-fd?, > i.e. (terminal? (port-internal-fd (current-output-port)))? It does, except the fact that I would avoid port-internal-fd as much as possible. If it has to be called, then it could be hidden behind terminal?. -- Duy