A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (09 Sep 2019 10:09 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (09 Sep 2019 13:31 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Sep 2019 15:10 UTC)
(missing)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Sep 2019 21:57 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (10 Sep 2019 12:04 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Linus Björnstam (08 Oct 2019 20:08 UTC)

A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen 09 Sep 2019 10:08 UTC

The test file imports transducers module instead of srfi-171. I
suppose transducers is from Guile, so we're not really testing the
reference implementation.

The tests test "transduce" procedure, not defined in the ref.
implementation. I'm guessing this is list-transduce.

tindex is tested and exported, but not defined in the SRFI.

tcat is also mentioned in the SRFI and the test, probably should
renamed to tconcatenate. Same for tdedups -> delete-duplicates.

There are also tpartition-by and tpartition-all, used by the tests but
I don't know what these are in the SRFI.

171-impl.scm uses reverse!. As far as I can tell this is not part of
standard scheme. Not sure if it should mentioned in the "Sample
implementation" section.
--
Duy