A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (09 Sep 2019 10:09 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (09 Sep 2019 13:31 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Sep 2019 15:10 UTC)
(missing)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Sep 2019 21:57 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen (10 Sep 2019 12:04 UTC)
Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Linus Björnstam (08 Oct 2019 20:08 UTC)

Re: A couple of notes after trying tests.scm Duy Nguyen 10 Sep 2019 12:04 UTC

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 6:31 AM Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I opened https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-171/pull/2
>> fixing all the problems I found by running the tests
>
> ...

False alarms on tindex and tpartition-all tests. They are present but
with different names. I uncommented their tests.

I may have a couple more comments on the SRFI itself. I like the SRFI
though, a nice addition to scheme libraries.
--
Duy