On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:14 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, 7:05 AM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
>>
>> Arthur will probably say this when he wakes up, but as a matter of policy, SRFIs should be discussed on the SRFI mailing list (copying github or anyone else is fine, of course).  Full records of discussion have often been invaluable clues to design and motivation years or even decades later.
>
>
> Yes, that's right.  Is important to preserve the history of the discussions on the mailing lists.  Github is fine for delivering patches, but please don't use it for discussion.

For the record, the only comment so far is about test expectation of
the last test, which is correct but the test is code wrong (I got it
the other way around, I changed the test expectation to fit the test
code).
--
Duy