I agree that it's too big a dependency and probably shouldn't be there.  By adding timespec=, timespec<, and friends, plus timespec->inexact (which is probably good on other grounds) and for completeness inexact->timespec, I think we can do without the comparator.  What do others think?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:44 AM Göran Weinholt <xxxxxx@weinholt.se> wrote:
Hello schemers,

SRFI-174 defines a comparator object for timespecs. I needed to read the
reference implementation to understand that it's a SRFI-128 comparator.
Could the document be updated with a reference to SRFI-128?

(It's also an unexpectedly large dependency for such a small library,
but c'est la vie).

Regards,

--
Göran Weinholt   | https://weinholt.se/
Debian developer | 73 de SA6CJK