> On Mar 2, 2020, at 6:53 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Since SRFI 177's main goal is compatibility with existing Scheme
> keyword systems, it will use the syntax (call/kw foo 1 2 :d 3 :e 4).
>
> Good.  CL uses leading colons, they are lexically valid everywhere (as keywords or symbols), and I urge you to choose this format.
>

Wasn’t the foo: syntax more common than the :foo syntax among Scheme implementations?

Marc