Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 02:46 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>: [...] > SRFI 177 isn't a single implementation strategy: it's more like one per Scheme implementation, except for R6RS implementations without native keywords. The importance of native keyword support isn't just efficiency, it's interoperability between native code and portable code, and SRFI 177 is careful to preserve that. I think the latter point is not at all clear to me. Could someone clarify what exactly is supposed to be achieved here with interoperability?
