I've combed the various (sub)threads and tried to collate what's left
to do.  With the exception of (3), the following affect only the SRFI
document.

(1) The following recently-added procedures need to be added to the
SRFI document:

* reverse-vector->bitvector
* reverse-bitvector->vector/int
* reverse-bitvector->vector/bool

(ml ref: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-178/msg/15038915/)

(3) Add reverse-bytevector->/<-bitvector conversions?  (Nontrivial)
(ref: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-178/msg/15035077/)

(4) Clarify argument order in bitvector folds.
(ref: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-178/msg/15036897/)

(5) Rename bitvector= to bitvector=?.
(ref: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-178/msg/15023973/)

Probably closed par fatwa de mufti, but:

(*) Possibly change the failure return value of bitvector-first-bit.
(I agree with Marc and would prefer that it returned #f).
(ref: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-178/msg/15026057/)

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"The difference between theory and practice is, uh, larger in
practice than in theory." --Olin Shivers