On 2020-09-01 14:23 -1000, Shiro Kawai wrote:
> And this is a bit more debatable.
>
> In the srfi text, vector->bitvector and reverse-vector->bitvector only
> takes one argument, bvec.   In the reference implementation, they can take
> optional start and end arguments.
>
> The reference implementation seems to make more sense, but the srfi is
> already finalized.

That's unfortunate.  I recall agreeing with John that those procedures
should take those optional arguments, but I guess it didn't make it
in.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"In a bureaucracy, the file cards are reality. Punching
new holes recreates the world." --Alan Moore, _V For Vendetta_