On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 8:53 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
>
> Am Fr., 7. Mai 2021 um 13:18 Uhr schrieb Bradley Lucier <xxxxxx@math.purdue.edu>:
>>
>> I suppose it would be good to collect together the ideas that have come
>> up in these discussions in an "Issues" section of the SRFI document for
>> future consideration.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to write an updated SRFI in parallel so that Alex and others can already implement an improved API?

I think the issues at this point are minimal.  It's probably worth waiting until
the SRFI has been in use for a while longer to see what else turns up before
starting an update.

--
Alex