Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (22 Sep 2021 22:30 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 John Cowan (24 Sep 2021 19:24 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Alex Shinn (25 Sep 2021 13:24 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (25 Sep 2021 16:43 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Alex Shinn (28 Sep 2021 07:36 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2021 20:20 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (28 Sep 2021 20:30 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (01 Oct 2021 00:07 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Alex Shinn (01 Oct 2021 00:43 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Lucier, Bradley J (05 Oct 2021 01:04 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 John Cowan (06 Oct 2021 01:26 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Lucier, Bradley J (06 Oct 2021 13:48 UTC)
Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier (05 Oct 2021 19:54 UTC)
array-{append|stack|inner-product} Bradley Lucier (21 Oct 2021 15:52 UTC)

Re: Following up on SRFI 179 Bradley Lucier 05 Oct 2021 19:54 UTC

On 9/24/21 3:24 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> 1) Add a note near the top saying that array-map is how you do matrix
> addition, Hadamard multiplication, and other elementwise operations.
> People I show 179 to are always surprised that these are "missing".
>
> 2) Add the word "transpose" and/or "transposition" to the explanation of
> array-permute; people who deal with matrices will think of a permutation
> matrix rather than a transpose operator.

OK, John, I added a new section of "Informal remarks" in my new draft
that I believe fulfills the spirit of your comments.  It's right near
the top of

https://github.com/gambiteer/srfi-179-followup/blob/b452cfbcbe8aa2d7677dddb326d57754cc8aa9ca/srfi-179.html

I also removed the phrase "by exploiting the algebraic structure of
affine one-to-one mappings on multi-indices" from the Rationale. That
probably helps, too.

Brad