|
The Scheduler Will Fitzgerald (11 Apr 2000 18:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
Marc Feeley
(13 Apr 2000 14:16 UTC)
|
|
RE: The Scheduler
Will Fitzgerald
(13 Apr 2000 15:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
Marc Feeley
(13 Apr 2000 16:56 UTC)
|
|
RE: The Scheduler
Will Fitzgerald
(13 Apr 2000 17:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
David Rush
(14 Apr 2000 10:34 UTC)
|
|
RE: The Scheduler
Will Fitzgerald
(14 Apr 2000 13:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
Marc Feeley
(14 Apr 2000 13:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
David Rush
(14 Apr 2000 15:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
Mark K. Gardner
(14 Apr 2000 16:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
David Rush
(14 Apr 2000 16:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: The Scheduler
Marc Feeley
(15 Apr 2000 02:26 UTC)
|
The Scheduler Will Fitzgerald 11 Apr 2000 18:12 UTC
I'm curious why the scheduler wasn't made a data type, too, and, in particular, why the scheduling algorithm isn't changeable. Further (and relatedly), I'm curious why priority and quantum are defined as the only thread-related data that affect the scheduling. If the scheduling algorithm were separate, there might be other data it would want to consider (e.g., deadlines). -- Will